|
|
|
|
|
CNN 国际新闻
📌 标题：The court tosses $1.25 million verdict for man who says Roundup caused his cancer
📅 发布时间：Updated Jun 25, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
📝 英文原文：
The Supreme Court on Thursday sided against a Missouri man who claimed that theherbicide Roundupcaused his cancer, backing an argument from the product’s manufacturer that the lawsuit should have been barred because the federal government does not require a cancer warning on the label.Justice Brett Kavanaughwrote the opinion for a 7-2 court. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Neil Gorsuch dissented.The lawsuit at issue was filed by John Durnell, who became known as “spray man” in his St. Louis neighborhood for using Roundup in the parks around his home. Years later, after Durnell was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, he sued Monsanto, claiming his exposure to the pesticide was to blame. A jury awarded him $1.25 million.But the decision could have implications for thousands of other lawsuits that have been filed against the company over its weedkiller. And it comes on an issue that has increasingly motivated PresidentDonald Trump’s “Make America Healthy Again” supporters. Hundreds of people who support tighter regulations on pesticides turned out at the Supreme Court in early April when the case was argued, a far more significant crowd than most of this year’s appeals have drawn.Before he joined the Trump administration, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was a leading advocate against pesticides. Kennedy was part of the legal team that represented DeWayne “Lee” Johnson, a San Francisco school groundskeeper who was diagnosed in 2014 with terminal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. For years he had sprayed Roundup around the grounds he maintained.Durnell’s win rested on the idea that Monsanto failed to provide a cancer warning and marketed the product as safe to use without protection. Monsanto has maintained that the active ingredient in Roundup, glyphosate, does not cause cancer. And the company said that a federal law that gives wide authority to the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate weedkillers preempted the state law claims. The EPA has nev
---
🇨🇳 中文翻译：
周四，最高法院站在密苏里州一名男子的一边，该男子声称除草剂农达导致了他的癌症，并支持该产品制造商的论点，即该诉讼应该被禁止，因为联邦政府不要求在标签上显示癌症警告。法官布雷特·卡瓦诺（Brett Kavanaugh）为7比2的法庭撰写了意见。大法官克坦吉·布朗·杰克逊和尼尔·戈萨奇提出了异议。 该诉讼由约翰·杜内尔提起，他在圣路易斯市被称为“喷雾人”。
🔗 原文链接：阅读全文
本文由自动抓取系统生成，英文原文已自动翻译为中文。 |
本站资源免费共享，所发布的一切资源均收集于互联网用户公开分享，本站不对资源拥有任何版权，版权争议与本站无关，您必须在学习后的24个小时之内，从您的设备中彻底删除上述内容。
1. 本站不对资源进行任何的制作和改造，仅限用于学习和研究目的；
2. 您不得将上述内容用于商业或者非法用途，否则，一切后果请用户自负;
3. 本站内容如侵犯了您的合法权益，请及时留言，以便本站及时清理;
4. 本站作者QQ：41020712，可免费下载！
5. 盗版，破解有损他人权益和违法作为，请各位用户支持正版！
|
