|
|
|
|
|
CNN 国际新闻
📌 标题：Alito and Jackson’s fiery debate over the Voting Rights Act exposes Supreme Court tensions
📅 发布时间：Updated May 5, 2026, 2:45 PM ET
📝 英文原文：
The November election is still a long way off, but patience is already running thin at the Supreme Court.An explosive exchange between three conservative justices andliberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jacksonlate Monday underscored a tension that has developed in voting cases as the court runs headlong into an election-heavy docket that will have far-reaching implications for the midterms.Jackson accused the court of rolling over its “principles” in pursuit of influencing the November election.Justice Samuel Alito fired back, calling that “insulting.” The conservative justice said Jackson’s dissent raised “trivial” and “baseless” arguments.The heated back-and-forth over what amounted to a technical question about Louisiana’s congressional map comes as the high court is already juggling other appeals that could haveconsequences for this year’s election– not to mention a flood of short-fuse litigation expected this summer and fall.“To avoid the appearance of partiality here, we could, as per usual, opt to stay on the sidelines and take no position,”Jackson wrote in a scathing dissenton Monday. “But, today, the court chooses the opposite. Not content to have decided the law, it now takes steps to influence its implementation.”“What principle has the court violated?” Alito fired back in a concurring opinion joined by conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. “The principle that we should never take any action that might unjustifiably be criticized as partisan?”Within the world of the Supreme Court, those words were unusually harsh, but it’s the latest example of tension behind the curtain slipping into public view.Related articleAnti-abortion activists participate in the annual March for Life rally on January 23 in Washington, DC.Kevin Dietsch/Getty ImagesThe Supreme Court may force Trump to take a position on mifepristone6 min readJustice Sonia Sotomayor, the court’s senior liberal, issued arare public apologylast month for suggesting earlier that Justice Bre
---
🇨🇳 中文翻译：
距离 11 月的选举还有很长的路要走，但最高法院的耐心已经在消失。周一晚间，三名保守派法官和自由派法官克坦吉·布朗·杰克逊之间的爆炸性交锋，突显了投票案件中出现的紧张局势，因为法院一头扎进了一个将对中期选举产生深远影响的选举案。杰克逊指责法院为了影响 11 月的选举而推翻了其“原则”。
🔗 原文链接：阅读全文
本文由自动抓取系统生成，英文原文已自动翻译为中文。 |
本站资源免费共享，所发布的一切资源均收集于互联网用户公开分享，本站不对资源拥有任何版权，版权争议与本站无关，您必须在学习后的24个小时之内，从您的设备中彻底删除上述内容。
1. 本站不对资源进行任何的制作和改造，仅限用于学习和研究目的；
2. 您不得将上述内容用于商业或者非法用途，否则，一切后果请用户自负;
3. 本站内容如侵犯了您的合法权益，请及时留言，以便本站及时清理;
4. 本站作者QQ：41020712，可免费下载！
5. 盗版，破解有损他人权益和违法作为，请各位用户支持正版！
|
