|
|
|
|
|
CNN 国际新闻
📌 标题：The court handed Trump an election case defeat. Is a bigger win for him coming?The Supreme Court’s ruling letting more than a dozen states keep their post-election grace periods for mail ballots is a defeat for President Donald Trump and Republicans ahead of the midterms, but the GOP can still capture significant victories in major election-related cases coming farther down the pipeline.
📅 发布时间：Updated Jun 29, 2026, 10:03 PM ET
📝 英文原文：
The Supreme Court’s ruling letting more than a dozen stateskeep their post-election grace periods for mail ballotsis a defeat for President Donald Trump and Republicans ahead of the midterms, but the GOP can still capture significant victories in major election-related cases coming further down the pipeline.On Monday, two Republican-appointees joined the three liberal justices in rejecting GOP claims that federal law did not allow states to count postmarked mail ballots that arrive at election offices after Election Day. The ruling upheld Mississippi’s five-day mail ballot grace period — after the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals had struck it down. It comes after Trump last year tried tounilaterally punish statesfor counting mail ballots arrived after Election Day.But in an under-the-radar maneuver, the Supreme Court took up a separate case that could help Trump and Republicans tighten voter rules in the name of preventing noncitizen voting. Next term, the justices will consider reviving parts of an Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship for voting. The case — RNC v. Mi Familia Vota — could also give states the green light to conduct mass voter purges of suspected noncitizens in the days and the weeks before an election.That case won’t likely be settled by the midterms, but stands to be resolved ahead of 2028. It fits into a Trump agenda of pushing for more aggressive action to clamp down on noncitizen voting — which studies have shown to be very rare — even if the tactics risk disenfranchising eligible voters as well.The mail ballot case decided Monday “favored states’ rights in a way that benefited voters,” said Richard Hasen, an election law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.“Mi Familia favors states’ rights against the interests of voters,” Hasen told CNN.Related articleGreenery frames the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 22, 2026.Kylie Cooper/ReutersTakeaways from the Supreme Court’s decisions expanding Trump’s firing
---
🇨🇳 中文翻译：
最高法院允许十多个州保留选举后邮寄选票宽限期的裁决，对唐纳德·特朗普总统和共和党来说是中期选举前的一次失败，但共和党仍然可以在未来的重大选举相关案件中取得重大胜利。周一，两名共和党任命的法官与三名自由派法官一起驳回了共和党的主张，即联邦法律不允许各州计算选举时收到的带邮戳的邮寄选票。
🔗 原文链接：阅读全文
本文由自动抓取系统生成，英文原文已自动翻译为中文。 |
本站资源免费共享，所发布的一切资源均收集于互联网用户公开分享，本站不对资源拥有任何版权，版权争议与本站无关，您必须在学习后的24个小时之内，从您的设备中彻底删除上述内容。
1. 本站不对资源进行任何的制作和改造，仅限用于学习和研究目的；
2. 您不得将上述内容用于商业或者非法用途，否则，一切后果请用户自负;
3. 本站内容如侵犯了您的合法权益，请及时留言，以便本站及时清理;
4. 本站作者QQ：41020712，可免费下载！
5. 盗版，破解有损他人权益和违法作为，请各位用户支持正版！
|
